Friday, November 25, 2016

Conflict with the World, Part 1, Theory

In John 17:14-16, Jesus prays that his disciples not be "of the world" since he is not. Jesus then goes on to say that the World will hate the disciples of Jesus. In John's first epistle (I John 2:15-17), he tells the followers of Jesus to "not love the world."

As we move from the Gospel of John into the epistles (letters) of John, we might look at this concept of "the world". The Bible has a fair amount to say about the "World" (Greek "kosmos") and the path of the citizen of heaven.  According to the Bible, the cosmos is under the control of Satan (I John 4:4 and I John 5:19.) The world is the object of God's every action. Other passages on examples of "loving the World" include Genesis 3:6, Joshua 7:21, 2 Sam 11:2. New Testament verses on "the World" are John 12:31, 14:30, 16:11.  (I'll return to these at some later time.)

In my country (USA) in my times (late 20th, early 21st century) the Christian conflict with "the World" has often been misunderstood. This conflict is often interpreted to mean that believers must wage some type of "war" on the culture around them.

The New Testament view of "the World" is quite different. The follower of Jesus recognized that there was a higher kingdom, a higher citizenship (see Hebrews 11: 13-16) and that the political establishment (primarily the Roman empire) and the social establishment (civic Judaism) was in principle opposed to the things of God. Even the local social fabric in Israel seemed to promote a fake religiosity that allowed one to act spiritual (to act like a sincere Jew) while being insincere.

This has not significantly changed in two millenia. The Christian still should not expect to be rewarded socially or politically by his/her commitment to follow the Messiah. One of Jesus's teachings (Matthew 10:34-39) is particularly depressing in that regard, unless we are indeed looking for the City God has prepared for us.

The relationship between the Christ-follower and their community is a complicated one. It should be so.  There should always be a certain tension between a Christ-follower and the community within which he/she lives, just like there is a certain tension in traveling overseas, in a culture and community that is not one's home.

Some of our community culture comes from within "the church", from religious organizations. Just as  Jesus experienced the sharpest conflict with the Jewish religious leaders, so too the Christ-follower will discover that religion (Christian religion) is in conflict with genuine spiritual growth and action. In any society in which Christianity has begun to hold significant social or political power, the culture has invaded the church. In my experience, we may need to be most alert to the influences of "the World" on Sunday. And it will not be in ways we first expect.

I have been in a number of churches that used Romans 14: 13-21 -- a passage that emphasizes compassion for spiritually weaker brothers or sisters -- to prohibit the drinking of alcoholic beverages. This is not because of some deep understanding of Scripture, but instead a long running cultural response to Prohibition in twentieth century America. A thoughtful reading of that passage in Romans should lead one to act differently in a number of ways -- and alcohol is the least of the problems of the church!

At some point, one has to decide with Habbakuk (Habbakuk 4: 17-18): "Though the fig tree does not bud and there are no grapes on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though there are no sheep in the pen and no cattle in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the LORD, I will be joyful in God my Savior."

In the New Testament one might observe the "Agrippa Principle" -- Christians often speak from chains -- (Acts 26: 28-29)... Agrippa said to Paul, "Do you think that in such a short time you can persuade me to be a Christian?"  Paul replied, "Short time or long--I pray God that not only you but all who are listening to me today may become what I am, except for these chains."

I will try to flesh this out further in a second, later post.  At one time I was very much immersed in the political fight against "the World". At one time I was president of the local chapter of Citizens for Decency, leading a campaign to rid the community of pornography (among other concerns.) I lost track of the true focus of the Christian life and stooped for political influence.  I regret that.

6 comments:

  1. One of our long-running conversations. John Piper posted a piece on structural racism on Desiring God a couple of days ago that speaks well to this. The "world," considered as a distorted system of power resulting from the Fall and further distorted by the scheming machinations of the Prince of Darkness, is filled with such structures. Racism, sexism, and ethnocentrism are 3 pervasive sociocultural systems that are immensely damaging within this world system, but so are all other structures by which this world is ordered when left to them sieves untempered by grace. Grace may take many forms, and one collection of such forms are moral and ethical traditions that can guide human beings to build and tend many those structures (not all--some are simply irredeemable) in beneficial rather than destructive ways. But all are susceptible to corruption because the humans who inhabit them are corrupt. The fundamentalist practice of defining "the world" so narrowly in terms of certain vices and peccadilloes distracted generations of fundamentalists and evangelicals from attacking the entrenched structural evil of Jim Crow and even to oppose those who took up the fight against that evil. This is a relatively recent historical example of the Church's complicity with "the World". Oh, and considered as a system, which the Church and Christianity unavoidably are, they are just as susceptible to the kind of corruption that co-opts them into the demonic world system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, a wonderful essay, thanks! (Maybe you should help me with my blog next year! smile.)

      The Piper article is here: http://www.desiringgod.org/articles/structural-racism

      I appreciate your thoughtful comments. "Vices and peccadillos" is an nice -- and descriptive -- phrase.

      Delete
  2. Wish I could edit. Temper, not tend.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. Yeah, I wish we could edit our replies. If I can do that on FB, why not here?

      Delete
  4. Well, I'm finally finding a bit more time to read and comment. Thanks for doing this. It's been my way of keeping up more regular Bible reading this year.

    ReplyDelete